Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz told Senate lawmakers on Dec. 11 that the FBIs applications to surveil a Trump campaign associate included significant errors that implicated the bureaus entire chain of command in serious performance failures.
Horowitz appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee two days after releasing a voluminous report examining the FBIs applications for Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants to surveil Carter Page, the Trump 2016 campaign associate. The report found that the initial application and the three renewal applications included 17 significant errors, several of which resulted from the FBI withholding evidence that would have harmed the chances of obtaining the warrants.
Republicans excoriated the failures and signaled that they would lose confidence in the FISA statute unless the secret surveillance court and the FBI implemented significant reforms to prevent future abuse. Horowitz included a list of suggested changes as part of the report. FBI Director Christopher Wray announced changes he plans to make at the bureau shortly after the report became public on Dec. 9.
Democrats underlined Horowitzs finding regarding bias among the officials in running the counterintelligence investigation of the Trump campaign. The inspector general didnt find evidence that bias played a role in the opening of the investigation, which the FBI code-named Crossfire Hurricane. Horowitzs team also didnt find evidence that bias played a role in the bureaus seeking to obtain a FISA warrant on Page.
The inspector general also responded, for the first time, to criticism of some of his offices conclusions lodged by Attorney General William Barr and U.S. Attorney John Durham. In a statement issued on the heels of the IG report, Barr said “malfeasance and misfeasance” detailed in the document reflected “a clear abuse of the FISA process.” Durham, in a separate statement, disagreed with Horowitzs conclusion about whether the FBI had the grounds to open an investigation of the Trump campaign. Barr assigned Durham earlier this year to investigate whether the Crossfire Hurricane probe and the accompanying spying on the Trump campaign were free of improper motive.
Horowitz told lawmakers that neither Barr nor Durham have provided information to his office that would change his conclusions. According to Horowitz, Durham has specifically disagreed that the FBI had a legal predicate to start a full investigation and should have begun a preliminary investigation. While preliminary investigations allow for the use of confidential informants, FBI investigators are prohibited from seeking more intrusive surveillance methods, including a FISA warrant, which the bureau secured to spy on Page.
In testimony, Horowitz stuck to the content of his report, but on occasion, used stronger language than the measured statements in the 476-page document. Horowitz said the surveillance of the Trump campaign was illegal because the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) wasnt apprised, as it should have been, of all the relevant information about Page.
“If you dont have a legal foundation to surveil somebody and you keep doing it, is that bad?” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) asked Horowitz.
“Absolutely,” Horowitz replied, adding that “its illegal surveillance.”
“Its not court-authorized surveillance,” he added.
In testimony, Horowitz also confirmed that claims from the so-called Steele dossier made up the entirety of the FBIs argument for probable cause in the FISA warrant applications. This conclusion vindicates House Republicans who have since last year claimed that the Steele dossier played a crucial part in the bureaus obtaining the FISA warrants.
Former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele compiled the dossier using second- and third-hand sources with ties to the Kremlin. The Hillary Clinton 2016 presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee ultimately funded Steeles work, a sensitive fact left out of the FISA applications.
The dossiers crucial role is significant because Horowitz found that the FBI was in possession of evidence that undermined the credibility of Steele and his sources, but withheld that evidence from the court. Horowitz testified that the FBI interviewed Steeles primary-level dossier source, who made several claims to the agents that contradicted the claims in the dossier. The source also cast doubt on the credibility of Steeles other sources.
The bureau never apprised the FISC about what it learned.
The testimony also brought to the forefront the differing views, even among members of the Republican Party, about the loopholes in the FISA statute that are ripe for the kind of abuse exposed in Pages case. Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) has long pushed to reform the FISA process to shield Americans against surveillance abuses. His colleague on the Judiciary Committee, Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.), is a national-security hawk who believes that FISA is essential. During the hearing, Sasse conceded that the kind of abuses Lee has warned about for years all occurred in the FBIs surveillance of Page.
“As a national security hawk, I have argued with Mike Lee—in the four and a half or five years that Ive been in the Senate—that stuff just like this couldnt possibly happen at the FBI and the Department of Justice,” Sasse said.
Horowitz emphasized the failures werent limited to a few individuals but were systemic throughout the entire chain of command across three separate investigative units. The FBI officials involved consistently failed to provide the inspector generals office with satisfactory explanatiRead More – Source